Hi On 27 May 2016 at 08:29, Devin Ulibarri <devin@ulibarri.website> wrote:
> (I found this in my drafts folder and am sending it out. I know a > decision was made about this, but am sending for continued reference.) Thank you! :) > > On 05/16/2016 11:13 PM, Dave Crossland wrote: > > Hi > > > > Does anyone want to discuss any more objections with me, or can I > > migrate the issue tracking to Github now? :) > > There has been some recent talk about this on various channels. I don't > know if any of this information will change anything, but I think it is > worth looking at and considering. > > > http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/ethics-in-ethics-out-promote-user-respecting-software-development-platforms If someone wants to set up a container for gitlab and mirror the github org, then we could flip the mirror and have github be a downstream mirror of the gitlab. But who will do this? > (Found the following while trying to find the above article.) > > http://www.wired.com/2015/06/problem-putting-worlds-code-github/ The article ends with, The question is ultimately whether GitHub will find ways to stay true to its ideals while generating returns—or wind up the stuff of legend. I think its pretty clear that Github's business model _depends_ on it hosting the world's libre licensed code: That's how they get developers into their conversion funnel. -- Cheers Dave
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
