As you might expect, I totally disagree.
First, by that time the damage has been done. Either the 'save as'
option has been taken with a new object created or the 'resumed'
document has been overwritten - as at present.
This feature has two objectives:
1 - require Journal items to have a name supplied by user
2 - enable the user to choose whether to save the object as a new
one or to simply save the modified document.
This proposal addresses neither objective.
You are not going to change your point of view so the only solution I
can see is to provide a gsetting option so that users and deployments
can decide on how they want this to work.
Re: the screenshot. Help me - as I remember this dialog was modal and
required an entry in the description area - leaving the title as 'Write
activity' was ok.
This was to implement Walter's desire that the description serve as the
message does in git.
Tony
On 07/15/2016 04:36 AM, Sebastian Silva wrote:
As promised here's a screenshot of Sugar 0.92's "save as" dialog:
captura de pantalla de 2016-07-14 21-33-17
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/199755/16861909/cc262c7c-4a0a-11e6-8ebd-88c4a5157595.png>
As per our meeting today I think Martin Dengler's proposal to land the
user in the Journal after quitting with focus on Object Title would be
a good solution.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/pull/327#issuecomment-232845789>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAULkhTztLdY3u833M4V3dte_sV3q3RMks5qVvISgaJpZM4JEg63>.
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
