Hi, Dave
The screenshot was archaeological - a feature since removed from Sugar.
I have not used any formal social science methodology (and really don't
plan to - my time at the deployments is limited and is focussed on
introducing new capabilities which may be of use to the teachers and
students.)
Tony
On 07/15/2016 02:55 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 15 July 2016 at 08:33, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net
<mailto:tony_ander...@usa.net>> wrote:
I think we all hope someone will attempt to work with and support
our users. I have a lot of experience over many years working
with deployments, but would not suggest anything I have done is
definitive.
I understand that; I'm curious as to if you have worked with 'formal'
user testing methods (eg
https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/)
This is a feature that my experience tells me is needed.
I don't doubt that :)
I am trying to develop a training sequence in web technology. It
is essential for that. Since it has been implemented and this is
open source,
I can use it as I need it.
Sure! I'm not trying to dissuade you from running private fork
features in the deployments you manage :)
I am trying to meet your needs as well as the needs of other
contributors.
I presume Sebastian posted the screenshot to suggest that the user
experience of this feature is not yet very good from his perspective.
The large size of the dialog is surprising to me.
Since you are leading the development of this feature, since you have
ready access to children with XOs, and since you are advocating the
change, I think that methodological user testing can help you improve
the feature for yourself, and help address the concerns of other
community members :)
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
