On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:29:53PM -0400, Walter Bender wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:26 PM Dave Crossland <[1]d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 23, 2018, 8:54 PM James Cameron <[2]qu...@laptop.org> wrote: > > Tony's insistence on ASLO continues to amuse me. Most distribution of > activities now happens through bundles, tarballs, and GitHub. ASLO is > rarely used by distributors or indeed useful for anything except > personal searches for broken activities. Tony's numbers make it > plain. My own plan is to remove the link to "activities" in Browse > default page; plenty of disk space these days to include all working > activities in a build. > > Good to hear real world usage of aslo has entered terminal decline. When > will it be turned off? > > I am not a fan of the current activity server, but I am a fan of > having lots of activities for our users to explore beyond the ones > that were chosen for them. So it seems we need some way for them to > explore, even if deployments (and deployers) feel otherwise.
Yes, a good goal to have. It's just that the reality has fallen far from it as activity maintenance has dwindled. -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
