Having thought about it intermittently for all of a day, I think that the leap hour is an acceptable approach to civil time. The changes, taking place over generations between leap hours, are slow enough so that the people can adjust. The leap hour itself is no greater than Daylight Saving Time changes in many regions. (There is no Daylight Saving Time in Hawaii or Arizona, among other places; people living there will be in for a shock when the leap hour occurs.)

I suggest that most sundials today are used for less than a century and that the accumulated error of several minutes within that interval after manufacture is acceptable to most casual users.

The dialing community would have the challenge of incorporating an offset of up to plus or minus one-half hour in an interesting, convenient and useful way so that dials can be accurate over many centuries. I have great confidence that it can be done. Perhaps a sundial design contest would be appropriate -- should the leap hour be adopted.

Looking back over the last millennium or two, I find it daunting to predict sundial designs and timekeeping itself a millennium into the future. Anyone care to try?

Both books on Daylight Saving Time listed below are interesting. I recommend them to the list. "Seize the Daylight" gives a more global perspective of the two, and it therefore may be of somewhat greater interest to those on this list.

Gordon Uber
San Diego, California


Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:10:10 -0700
To: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de
From: Gordon Uber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Save the Leap Second

Sundial List,

Having read two recent books on the tumultuous history of Daylight Saving Time ("Seize the Daylight" and "Spring Forward"), I think that a one-hour difference between zone time and sun time may be too large, even if it will not occur in my lifetime. Of course, it may be considered to be plus or minus one-half hour.

Clock setting is already becoming increasingly automatic with radio-controlled and GPS clocks and time displays on mobile phones. Therefore I don't see a major problem for the typical person with respect to clock setting a millennium hence with either leap seconds or leap hours for civil time. Either will be incorporated into the time distribution and display systems. Missing the equivalent of a favorite TV program or an hour of wages will be more contentious.

Gordon Uber
San Diego, California


-

Reply via email to