Dear Frans,

Like Gianni, you produce splendid scholarly
input to this list!

I promised not to challenge your answer so
I will constrain this reply accordingly!

You have made me think about Zinner's
imagination...

If you have a medieval sundial such as you
describe [a vertical dial, assumed direct
south-facing, and a horizontal gnomon] AND
a clock (no matter how bad) there will be a
natural temptation to compare the clock and
the sundial.

If you choose noon as your start-of-day, then
you can set the clock each day at the moment
of transit (vertical shadow) and then mark
the position of the tip of the shadow of your
gnomon at hourly intervals (as timed by the
clock) from noon.

If you keep this up for six months, then you
will see that the marks for a given hour join
up in a straight line.  Moreover, the set of
straight lines all intersect at a point some
way above the foot of the gnomon.

Then one night, someone looks up at the dial
and notices that the line from the tip of the
gnomon to the magic point is at an angle
to the horizontal that corresponds to the
altitude of Polaris.  Wow!  This way you get
to invent the polar-oriented gnomon. :-)

Now, if you choose sunRISE as your start of
day, you set the clock at sunrise and you
can again mark the position of the tip of
the shadow at hourly intervals.  Again you
get straight lines but they don't intersect
at a common point.

You don't get to invent the polar-oriented
gnomon but you do get to invent a Babylonian
hours sundial.

If you choose sunSET as your start of day
then you can do the same thing but you will
have to wait until daylight before you can
mark the positions.

The early clocks would have drifted during
the night so it would be more difficult to
notice the straight lines but not impossible.

For completeness I could note that (accurately
laid out) temporary hour lines are not (quite)
straight (because they are not projections of
great circles).

They DO intersect at the sub-nodus point but
only because they curve towards that point.
The straight sections of temporary hour lines
approximately intersect at a point a little
above the sub-nodus point.

I assume that it is this higher point that was
used for the medieval gnomon?

This is already suggesting a reason for bending
the gnomon downwards.  Zinner could be right!

As you can tell, I am very weak on the history
side of this business :-(

Best wishes

Frank

---------------------------------------------------
https://lists.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/sundial

Reply via email to