On the 03.12.05 at 14:26, Michael Heydekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03.12.05: >> On the 03.12.05 at 00:52, Michael Heydekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Ehhmm - which FreeXP version are you using, BTW? >> RC4 >>> There is a problem with RC4 and UKAW because UKAW opens XP.EXE in >>> R/W mode. This doesn't work anymore as the former XP.OVR is now an >>> integral part of XP.EXE. >> Ah, aha! > Look at the size of XP.EXE... Yeah, it's huge! >>> There is an RC5 test version available (same as RC4 but XP.EXE and >>> XP.OVR reside as two different files again). See: >>> ftp://ftp.freexp.de/freexp/test/FXPOVR.ZIP >> OK, got it now and ..... >>> But this shouldn't be the problem in your case as you would get >>> different results then (UKAW would complain about a wrong XP >>> version). >> ..... that was the problem. > Did UKAW complain? It complained about being out of environment space, that's all. > My impression from your initial post was that it did simply nothing. Yes, that's right. It sat there doing nothing for around 5 seconds and then exited. >> UKAW is now working perfectly again - Pheeeeeeew! ;-) > I suggest that you use the UKAW patch tool to avoid it's annoying > header munging: Got it, thanks. > After applying it, you should send 'clean' RFC headers as with other > clients. OK, I've applied it prior to writing this message so let's see what happens :) > Happy FreeXP'ing... :-) Yes indeed ;-)) I really must update our English support site with all this valuable information that you've given me. Once again, many thanks. -- Martin --------------------------- FreeXP English Support Site http://www.freexp.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FreeXP Support-Mailingliste [email protected] http://www.freexp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support-list
