Phillip Jones wrote:
I've resigned myself to admit. as much fussing and gnashing of teeth we
users do a bout a missing feature it goes in one ear and out the other.
Developers, Develop, and have no interest in what the end user wants or
needs.
It's not that the developers don't care, it's that Seamonkey is just a mashup of
Firefox, Thunderbird, and Chazilla. It's not independent code, so unless Firefox
gets a decent forms manager I can't see one in Seamonkey.
The goal seems to be to provide the suite option with a minimum of resources
rather than to fork an independent code base which could have enhanced features,
like the webkit code chrome and safari reportedly are using. That's done quite
well. From Robert's constant comments about resources, I suspect that what we
have is a struggle.
--
Bill Davidsen <david...@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
