In <news:7ladndjm6tmkd_nwnz2dnuvz_sydn...@mozilla.org>,
Phillip Jones <pjon...@kimbanet.com> wrote:

> But Mozilla hears something about javascript could be dangerous, and
> banned ten minutes later. Go figure.

What you've posted is very misleading.  They didn't "hear something
about javascript could be dangerous", they know what javascript can and
can't do.  And they spent (wasted, IMO) a *lot* more than ten minutes
working on the problem before giving up on it.

Mozilla Messaging inherited a lot of stuff from previous
Mozilla Suite and Thunderbird developers, including a security model
which hadn't been maintained for years and was no longer usable.

The options were to spend a lot of time and effort to design and
implement a new security model or to take out javascript.  They started
down the first road only to realize it was a lot more time and effort
than anticipated.

-- 
»Q«                                                              /"\
                                      ASCII Ribbon Campaign      \ /
                                       against html e-mail        X
                                     <http://asciiribbon.org/>   / \
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to