Phillip Jones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/19/2010 6:02 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
BJ wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
I would be perfectly satisfied with a world in which multiple browsers
competed for market share but websites were coded to W3C standards.
That
would be a level playing field and the best browser(s) would win.
So would I, but that's not reality.
And anyway, how is writing a single version of compliant code not
"accommodating all browsers"? Are some browsers unable to display
compliant pages?
We all know that IE, produced by the 500 pound gorilla on the block,
does not display compliant pages . . . "compliantly" in many cases. IE
will display the page, but if the code is not written in "IE standards
(which in many cases differs substantially from W3C), it may display
that compliant code wayyyyy out of whack. I don't like that, but that
is the reality.
Until the market share shifts SUBSTANTIALLY toward FF/SM, developers
will be faced with the reality that, even though they write W3C
compliant code, it may not be displayed "properly" via IE.
And even then (i.e. if the market share shifts substantially to FF/SM),
I'm not so sure MS will surrender to W3C compliance. I'm sure that 500
pound gorilla has something ready to thwart that circumstance when the
time comes (if it ever does).
BJ
Perhaps, Page designers that design pages for w3c compliant should add a
notation.
/This website was written to World Wide Web Consortium Standards and
should show properly on the vast Major of Web browsers on the Market
today/. /If not please contact the creator of the browser that does not,
and please tell them you will discontinue use of there product until is
meets specifications/.
Then the users should do what it says.
The funny thing about w3c is MS is one of the Signatories of W3C, along
with Apple and other major industry players. MS specific goal in doing
so, is to find out what the specs are so that they can make them as far
as possible the other direction, to make more people dependent upon IE
rather than less.
I hope you correct the syntax before putting those statements into an
actual Web page.
"... Consortium specifications ..."
"... their product ..."
No. just a suggested Idea. the person doing so would word accordingly?
Yes I have a problem on occasion using words that sound alike, but are
spelled different. unfortunately the spell checker doesn't catch them. :-)
Note also these, which don't sound alike:
the vast majorITY
until IT meets specifications
I can understand "use of there product" based on what you said.
Obviously, no responsible web designer would roll out a page without
proofing it first.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
