On 7/25/10 8:42 PM, Henry wrote: > The reason I didn't consider 2.0.6 is that usually when new versions > come out they are buggy and it takes awhile for the bugs to get worked > out. > > Henry > > > d...@kd4e.com wrote: > >> Have you considered updating to 2.0.6 while you are going >> through the hassle? >> >> > David E. Ross wrote: >> >>> On 7/25/10 9:09 AM, Henry wrote: >>> >>>> I'm running a Dell computer with 3GHz processor, 2 G Ram and WinXP Pro >>>> SP2. >>>> >>>> I now have Mozilla 1.7.8 and want to upgrade to Seamonkey 2.04. Will >>>> that upgrade or do I have to go through a Seamonkey 1.x first? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Henry >>> >>> >>> I believe you should choose a different directory for SeaMonkey itself >>> and a different directory for the profile. >>> >>
There should be no new features. This should be a "stability" and security fix. "Stability" means that some important bugs have been fixed. "Security" means that the developers concentrated on fixing bugs that relate to being vulnerable to malware. The next version with some new capabilities will likely be 2.1 (NOT 2.0.1). -- David E. Ross <http://www.rossde.com/>. Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
