S. Beaulieu wrote: >Update: I got a phone call from the tech guy. >It seems that a whole bunch of stuff is going wrong >since something changed in IE (?) >and that the points I pushed forward about sniffing >and Gecko and so on turned out really useful for them. > Heh. So, they were coding not only to a single browser, but to a particular *version* of that browser. A favorite link of mine in this regard: http://google.com/search?q=cache:m2XM97fMGMIJ:www.evolt.org/article/Forward_compatibility_and_web_standards/17/60115/index.html+*-screwed-these-*-up+*-*-broken-links-everywhere+Large-sections-*-*-disappeared+mutual+mutual+*-didn't-support-*-proprietary-*-*-*-*-*+only-includes-Netscape-*+mutual+table-layout-images-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+it.did.not+*-*-*-*-incorrect-content-type-header#comment-60184 http://tinyurl.com/StandardsMatter http://www.evolt.org/article/Forward_compatibility_and_web_standards/17/60115/index.html#comment-60184
>He said they are definitely going to correct the website appropriately. > Better late than never. >Our community: 1 >Shoddy programming: 0 > Heh. Standards DO matter. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
