Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on "browser" - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another one that I like better than Atomic...and I like Atomic
better than Safari.
To say that Apple "won't allow" competing software on the App store only
tells me that you haven't done much surfing on the App store. Go look.
Rufus, when you are in a hole, please stop digging. And please go
educate yourself on the issue before continuing to sprout off.
Thank you.
Phil
The premise that Apple "won't allow" is simply false - period. The you
don't want to swim in their pool?..fine. Just say so. But It's not
"impossible". Just flat not.
there is one thing that Apple doesn't allow on the Mac. It was banned
6 month after it came out: Active-X
Netscape communicator had a Active-X plugin. Apple ut out a notice after
6 month saying they found Active-X far more dangerous than JavaScript or
Even Java. (this was back at a time) when The security Java was
questioned. back in the late 90's They did a software update and the
plugin would no longer function.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net mailto:pjon...@kimbanet.com
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
