On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 13:44:24 -0700, sean nathan bean <sean.b...@wizard.invalid.net> wrote:
>JohnW-Mpls sent me the following:: >> >> Phooey, SM's 2.2 is no better at being fully accepted at some sites - 2.2's >> new option to "advertise FireFox compatibility" does not help, at least for >> me. One of my major sites is adding stuff SM just does not see and I >> cannot afford to miss those things. >> >> So, I'm switching my browser work to FireFox - hate to leave good old SM - >> and I now need to re-establish all my passwords. I'm also a little >> concerned about all the talk about fancy FF add-ins - I doubt I want any but >> I dislike being bothered by someone interrupting me to tout some new >> capability. >> >> I'll keep using SM for the mail and address book - the best arrangement I've >> seen (supposedly equaled only by the old Eudora). One remaining problem in >> SM Mail is the inability to automatically delete old messages in more than >> just my first account - I'd like the same service in at least six more >> accounts. Or am I missing some setting or option? >> > >some links to sites that still block you would be helpful indeed... > >sean My current problem is not SM being blocked from a password protected bank site, but that some graphics inside an open site cannot be seen using SM. One URL is <http://pastortania.posterous.com/> - the photos with the blog are not seen with SM 2.2. I got to that URL via my church's site <http://westwoodlutheran.org/content.cfm?id=151>. Also, my church's site is the one that does not accept SM 2.2 for my uploads of files - need to use FF,IE,... -- JohnW-Mpls _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
