On 09/29/2011 07:44 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote:
> Paul B. Gallagher schrieb:
>> HACKERS BREAK SSL ENCRYPTION USED BY MILLIONS OF SITES
> 
> That doesn't sounds correct. Firefox itself is not affected at all when 
> WebSockets are turned off. And WebSockets are not used by millions of 
> sites. It looks like the Java plugins is affected though and we are 
> discussing blocking all versions of Java on all versions of Firefox.
> 
> The same should be true 1:1 for SeaMonkey.
> 
> Robert Kaiser
> 

Blocking all versions of Java on all versions of Firefox + SeaMonkey?
Seriously?

Are you referring to this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689661
[Block Java Plugin due to security vulnerabilities (BEAST TLS and bug in
same-origin-policy)]

Doing that kills sites that use java. Example:
http://myspeed.visualware.com/index.php

Users can easily turn on/off java using prefbar.

Related (from that bug report):
<http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2011/09/27/attack-against-tls-protected-communications/>
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/09/29/firefox_killing_java/>
<http://www.imperialviolet.org/2011/09/23/chromeandbeast.html>

Seems like dejavu:
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/21/mozilla_blocks_java_plug_in/>
[Mozilla blocks Firefox Java plugin]
"Discussions on Bugzilla show this is unrelated to a flaw in Java Web
Start affecting multiple browsers and patched by Oracle via an
out-of-sequence (emergency) update last week."
<http://jaxenter.com/mozilla-block-java-deployment-toolkit-11057.html>
[Mozilla Block Java Deployment Toolkit]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to