Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Justin Wood (Calek-dude) wrote:
Well it also matters to know that Firefox did the same mechanical
difference, due to their ends resources around the holiday, incase
there is an issue that would be deemed critical to users (necessary of
a chemspill) when they are unable to have the manpower to fix it fast
enough.
Having less users have the update makes it less time-critical, and
less 'really weird' interactions with the core product.
I will be turning it back on within the next few days, and this
holiday coupled with Firefox's choice here is why I chose to do it. I
acknowledge that not everyone approves of the choice, but I felt it
the lesser of two evils. (the other evil being exposing all SeaMonkey
users to a potential major issue that Firefox is either not yet aware
of or not yet able to address as fast).
Fair enough. I have commented before on my view of
the Firefox "Frequent release" schedule, and reiterating
that point here, relevant though it clearly is, would
almost certainly accomplish nothing.
Philip Taylor
--
… don't try and feel the pain.
That's impossible. Just try
and free ur mind. then you will
realize the truth. … there is no pain.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
