On 9/11/12 5:43 AM, Desiree wrote: > "David E. Ross" <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message > news:wdudnejmlvjea9pnnz2dnuvz_qedn...@mozilla.org... >> On 9/10/12 12:24 PM, Ant wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> It won't let me upgrade today so far: http://i.imgur.com/y5JIu.gif and >>> http://i.imgur.com/zVTLP.gif ... I wonder if it is just me (looks like >>> it based in this newsgroup so far). Is there an update log somewhere for >>> me to check? Also, what was fixed? >>> >>> Thank you in advance. :) >>> >> >> I downloaded the partial .mar file to update incrementally from 2.12 to >> 2.12.1 instead of doing a complete installation. Using my own DOS >> script based on >> <https://wiki.mozilla.org/Software_Update:Manually_Installing_a_MAR_file>, >> I had no problem. > > I'm wondering if, because of your method, you ended up installing the wrong > files since the patch files pushed orginally were build 1, not the correct > build 2?
The SHA1 hashcode on today's FTP download site matches the .mar file I used. -- David E. Ross <http://www.rossde.com/> Anyone who thinks government owns a monopoly on inefficient, obstructive bureaucracy has obviously never worked for a large corporation. © 1997 by David E. Ross _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
