On 13/02/14 11:08, MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 12/02/2014 20:33, Trane Francks told the world:
There's also no reason whatsoever that minor and patch-level releases
cannot (or even should not) be padded to the number of expected places,
e.g., 2.08.03. That keeps the versions obvious and the sorting simple to
read.
That assumes that, when creating the *first* release of a product,
people know how many sub-releases are there going to be sometime in the
future.
MCBasto, are you suggesting that 2.08.03 might be indexed *before*
2.08?? Or that 2.26.08.32 might index *before* 2.26.08??
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.24 Build identifier: 20140131082240
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.23 Build identifier: 20131207080659
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
