On 8/07/2014 10:47 PM, WaltS48 wrote:
On 07/07/2014 11:53 PM, Hartmut Figge wrote:
Trane Francks:

My outbound mail all utilizes the X-Mailer header. It's worth noting
that neither 'User-Agent" or "X-Mailer" are specified in RFC 5322. As
such, it's perhaps less than kind to consider SM to be deteriorated when
the inclusion of either header is purely optional and in no way
addresses any particular RFC. At least, as far as I can recall.

Then why show the User-Agent in the header pane at all? ;)
Formerly at least X-Mailer was handled, maybe more notations also. I
didn't notice until today what had happened, because of Mnenhy.

Hartmut



I like to see it for newsgroup posts so I know whether I am responding
to a Windows, Mac, or Linux user when offering support, when they don't
mention it in the post.

That's the only reason I've got the pref set.

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26 Build identifier: 20140415200419
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.26 Build identifier: 20140408191805
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to