In <news:2o-dnvmjkvvwdghinz2dnuu7-lwdn...@mozilla.org>, Paul Bergsagel <pbergsa...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid > update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update > schedule would the net benefits be greater than if SeaMonkey > continued with the current rapid update schedule? Since the last SeaMonkey release, there have been over 40 MFSAs, many of them critical. IMO (and it's only that) if SM decided out of policy *not* to issue security updates in a timely manner, that would mark the death of the project. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
