Frank-Rainer Grahl a écrit :
Steve Wendt wrote:
On 11/20/2020 1:22 AM, Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Personally I am not impressed by the format. Looks impressive on
paper only. I doubt anyone other than google needs it in the real
world and they are now already working on webp2.
I found this nice article a while back:
https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg
Yes I read this too and agree. But I don't think it is even worth it for
small images.
Personally I think compression level has reached a peak. Everything you
do now compromises quality in some way.
Still using good old zip too. Compression is not that good but very
convenient to have something which works on almost every system out of
the box. Same with gif, png and jpeg. If something comes around which
does this we can talk again. webp and almost anything developed by
google isn't it. Unfortunately needs to be supported to an extent too.
FRG (backwards yokel)
Still sometimes using .zip but from some years i prefer .7z files: in
the past have problems with .zip (loss of empty folders: zip does not
add it if empty and some software look at folder presence and not at
what is inside). This occur with some zip tools but not others; since i
can not now the used tool for the received files it is risky for my usage.
7zip well configured gives smaller file (better compression) with no
loss AND it add to top folder (zip does not by default) and this is what
i want.
Jean-Charles
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
