On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:26:34 -0600, Yfrwlf wrote: > On 02/12/2012 08:19 AM, Evan Daniel wrote: > > So is there a ZI package yet? > > That sounds nice, you could make the ZI package/feed depend on JDK so > there were no longer any unfulfilled dependencies on the user's end > regardless of platform, since it would be automatically "installed". > Instead of the existing installer, you could have some of those > things done with a web-based first run setup wizard. Upgrades could > be handled by ZI updates instead of custom updaters, too. > > I don't know if redoing all that is worth it in exchange for certain > perks though, since Freenet has already implemented so many of its > own systems to make up for not having those systems exist across > platforms. Perhaps ZI is too late to the party. :)
It's not too late. The more packages, the more availability, the better. I prefer using Gentoo and it's ebuilds, so ZI is mostly irrelevant for me -- but I'm sure many people still need it. _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
