Hi Ivan, Ivan Vilata-i-Balaguer writes: > Hi Arne, thanks for the insights and the links. Please note that the > current CENO project is actually using Freenet as a signalling and > storage backend!`:)`
It’s great to know that this is still the case! >> (I submitted a project plan for improving this to NLnet which shows what >> would have to be done for an uncensorable and attack resistant >> news-network. It got into the short-list but wasn’t selected for >> funding: http://www.draketo.de/english/freenet/news-of-the-day ) > > That looks like a very interesting system! CENO already includes some > RSS feeds from selected sites, I'm not sure how this would aling with > the particular requirement (we were focusing more in web sites), but > it's without doubt an innovative approach. Thanks for sharing it! I’d have liked to finish it faster, but that requires about 10k€ to finance the required WoT speedups (WoT interaction is what currently slows down the system the most). >> > 2. Censored content is made available within a reasonable time. >> >> Just ask someone to run >> >> copyweb -d <folder> <URL>; freesitemgr add <folder> >> >> Or integrate that functionality into a program. You might want to use >> beautifulsoup to clean up the code for the Freenet content filter, i.e.: >> http://127.0.0.1:8888/freenet:USK@0iU87PXyodL2nm6kCpmYntsteViIbMwlJE~wlqIVvZ0,nenxGvjXDElX5RIZxMvwSnOtRzUKJYjoXEDgkhY6Ljw,AQACAAE/freenetproject-mirror/491/update.sh?type=text/plain > > CENO currently uses [bundler](https://github.com/equalitie/bundler), > which does a similar task. Thanks for the hints! Do I remember correctly that the bundler replicates the site as is — with all its dangers to privacy? (Freenet provides heavy whitelist filtering to protect its users from uploaded content). >> > 3. Access to censored dynamic content (i.e. web apps) is possible. >> >> That’s a hard one. You’d need to remodel the web apps to use Freenet as >> backend instead of the clearnet. >> >> I do not think that it is possible at all to provide anything which uses >> Javascript and at the same time preserve the anonymity of your users. > > Yeah, that's a hard one, that's why we may probably end up combining > several tools. You could even go as far as simply re-developing popular tools on top of Freenet as locally running tools. That might turn out to be easier than trying to secure javascript. > Wow, these a very useful links, thanks! We should communicate more often. >> […] PS: I’m only a few more hours away from being able to do proper >> Freenet releases, so we can finally deploy improvements to the >> freenet core again. > > Cool, good luck with that, and thanks again for the very informative > reply! Good luck to you, too! And Happy Hacking! - Arne _______________________________________________ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:support-requ...@freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
