On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 08:55:01PM +0000, Bob wrote: > Matthew Toseland <toad at ...> writes: > > --snip-- > > No, there will be an opennet. It will probably operate on similar > > principles to the current 0.5 network, but will be 0.7. > > > > > > We could have a rotating public nodes system like we currently do with > > > seednodes.ref, but surely this would horribly break the routing? > > > > Not necessarily. > > So the friend small-world thing is purely for the scalable darknet, and the > opennet will use something like ngrouting?
No, it will use the same routing, but will probably have some level of (slowish) path folding. > > > We have state level internet censorship? Replied to his response direct to author and to chat at freenetproject.org. Apologies for the noise. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20050919/7dc07cf8/attachment.pgp>
