On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 06:38:13PM +0200, van2 at vipmail.hu wrote: > Hi, > I'm worried about freenet wearing out my drive prematurely from the constant > disk access. I have a couple questions related to this:
If constant access wears out your drive then your drive is defective, take it back to the shop. :) > > 1. Is there any support for disk caching that might be able to reduce > disk accesses? No. > 2. Would increasing the memory available to the JVM make freenet read > the disk less? Increasing the total memory in the computer, so that more is cached by the OS, and reducing the datastore size, would make Freenet read the disk less. > 3. Also, I saw on IRC that someone was thinking of rewriting the code to > make the seedrefs file (?) reside > in memory instead of being constantly accessed from the disk, has this > actually been done, or do you think it's feasible? Doesn't mean anything to me. The routing table is in RAM, it's pretty much always been in RAM. > > Thanks guys, and congratulations on freenet, I think this is how the > internet Should be. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060401/4324599a/attachment.pgp>
