It's not possible to provide "permanent" storage for free. Full stop, as
far as I can tell. Because disks are finite, and flooding is possible.

On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:41:23PM +0000, Volodya wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> > talking about the datastore, if Freenet hasn't modified its behaviour
> > lately I recall the every stored key is bound to disappear sooner or
> > later from all the datastores.
> > 
> > This is good when seen a wise usage of available space, and this is
> > similar to the way bittorrent works (unpopulated torrents eventually
> > are bound to disappear).
> > 
> > However this is an undesirable behaviour to those looking for rare stuff.
> > 
> > The reason for these ramblings is as follows. In a single week two of
> > my older HDs have started  showing signs of death. This is bad. I had
> > to buy bigger a fat new HD to backup the data.
> > Imagine what would happen if a big HD suddenly fails?
> > 
> > Personally I don't have the money to buy a tape streamer or to
> > completely mirror my data. Burning DVDs is not a viable option: DVD
> > are prone to fast deterioration as time passes, plus they are
> > remarkably small, compared to a modern Hard Disk.
> > 
> > Now, what would happen if key are never bound to expire in a freenet 
> > datastore?
> > Then you would have a permanent remote backup of your precious data.
> > A darknet could be made to work as a remarkable distributed and (not
> > so strongly) encrypted multiuser network backup system.
> > If I recall correctly, the datastore size determines when a key is
> > about to expire. Given that I'm willing to dedicate a full encrypted
> > HD as a datastore, I'd like to suggest the possibility of a Freenet
> > branch with the option to disable key expiration and to stop storing
> > keys when the datastore is full.
> > 
> > sorry for the dumb request..
> > 
> > bye
> > Inverse
> 
> I don't think that anything is dumb in what you've written, but i don't think 
> that
> Freenet's goal is to archive the content. The ultimate goal is to allow for 
> communication
> and publication from the regimes where Free Speech doesn't protect the 
> particular idea or
> data you are trying to communicate or publish. It is not to say that this 
> content must
> stay available forever.
> 
> In fact one of the reasons why i tell people that freenet is great is because 
> of the
> karmikal balance on it. On the normal internet the more popular content dies 
> faster
> (server has to pay more for the distribution) while on Freenet the more 
> popular content
> will be last to go (it gets spread); that is just like in Bittorrent. 
> However, unlike in
> Bittorrent, the act of downloading content actually spreads it, even if you 
> go offline
> immediately after getting it.
> 
> While what you propose would help to keep unpopular content online, it would 
> break this
> sort of structure, and popular but new content would find it harder to 
> compete with the
> old. I am not making judgement here as to what content is actually important, 
> but i think
> that what you describe is perhaps very close to Frost's insert on demand. 
> Which at a very
> low cost can keep content available.
> 
>                     - Volodya
> 
> 
> - --
> http://freedom.libsyn.com/       Voice of Freedom, Radical Podcast
> http://freeselfdefence.info/     Self-defence wiki
> http://www.kingstonstudents.org/ Kingston University students' forum
> 
>  "None of us are free until all of us are free."    ~ Mihail Bakunin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFF+x0SuWy2EFICg+0RAvjqAKCj1wgpej79PjmVhG+rcbqBTb6LWACgpa9E
> mkUA0umAlbYllD0nh2bFjkM=
> =U278
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070317/2dcbe132/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to