Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
this is the packet
17:54:04.859876 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.860073 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.860273 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.860515 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.860733 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.860930 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.861129 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.861324 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.861614 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.861817 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.862016 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.862210 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.862408 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.862662 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.862863 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.863058 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.863260 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.863512 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.863733 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
17:54:04.863929 IP 192.168.9.3.netbios-dgm > 192.168.9.255.netbios-dgm:
NBT UDP PACKET(138)
192.168.9.3 is the proxy server (samba too) that has full access to
internet.
this packet is on sis1 (wan1) and sis3 (wan2).
regards, Rodolfo
Any chance of doing a tcpdump and see if a packet appears to be stuck in a loop?
Scott
On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
In my opinion the bug is still here.
The light (that indicate traffics) of the NIC (wan1 and wan2), are still.
And after I halt the secondary, and the webgui of primary is usuable,
the traffic of the interfaces (1 and 2) is more than 100 Megabytes
regards
Rodolfo
There was a bug in previous versions that would send the machine into
a interrupt storm due to a route bug. Your on a later version than
this so I really dont know what to say here.
Scott
On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich ha scritto:
sorry, I meant outbound load balancing
regards
Rodolfo
On 8/31/05, Rodolfo Vardelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bill Marquette ha scritto:
standard soekris 4801 + 2 lan
traffic? in that moment zero
and it happens only with carp+load balance with two boards
When you say load balancing do you mean arp balancing?
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
