On 4/5/06, Joshua Coombs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FreeBSD 6.0
> > ls -al ntpd
> -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  498934 Mar 17 14:47 ntpd
>
> That's ISC ntpd, no refclocks.  Given a choice between msntp, openntp,
> and isc, I vote ISC.  Open has been known to be abusive to servers in
> the past.
>
> Dragonfly also has their own ntp client now, I don't have any info on
> it however.
>
> If we setup isc ntpd correctly, once it's running, all configuration
> can be done live without tweaking conf files, including changes to
> both server associations and access restrictions.  This is something
> I've wanted to see pulled into pfsense, so I'm more than willing to
> try and do the heavy lifting to make it happen.

Works for me.   I too have seen various back and fourth finger
pointing with regards to OpenNTPD so it is most likely "safer" to go
with ISC's for the time being.

If you want to do the heavy lifting I'm all for commiting.

Scott

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to