On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:15:08 +0200 Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ispánovits Imre wrote: > > > If in this switch I dont't find any possibility to define that tagged port > > ten it means that this switch is unable to do this kind of job, or maybe if > > I > > define a port which belongs to all the defined vlans, as a common one, I can > > use it to connect the nic to? > > If the switch supports VLANs, it must support tagged ports. The actual > terms used might differ: generally, if the interface lets you assign one > port to multiple VLANs, then it's implicit they are tagged. One port can > be assigned as 'untagged' to one and only one VLAN. > That's it! I can define port to belong to multiple vlans, so I can it try tomorrow. It is an other thing that not knowing the vlans, I am a little bit uncertain if it is secure enough on a firewall. I mean packets are sharing the same physical media. How secure is it? Thank you Imre
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
