RB wrote: > > This question comes back up every few months, and every time I wonder: > what is the justification case for IPv6?
Maybe it's the simple argument: Jump on the Train!!! Hype or not, IPv6 is coming. Let the "we get out of IP's" yells beside this time. It's like talk about that a cellular does not need a camera. Or that cameras with more than 5Megapixels are never needed. Or "640k are enough" Take it or leave it as Customer. But: Take it or dissapear as Manufacturer. I love pfSense!! But I play around with IPv6 because I want to have a advance. If there is suddenly a other project that has IPv6 and it is similar to pfSense: Bye Bye faithfulness. Many good products made this way... Last Point: The energy we put in NAT, overlapping Networks, strange VPN's in legacy v4 is enormous. Many of this Problems are inexistant with v6. And a Firewall would be again what it ever was: A routing device were I can enforce who, what, when, why can talk to some other Node.... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
