I think this has a lot to do with the fact that there is never just one speaker on in the panned to
ambi rig, unlike the stero case, at least for amplitude panned material. This makes the imaging less
susceptible to acoustic differences between the speakers.
Dave
On 27/07/2011 03:26, Marc Lavallée wrote:
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:32:26 +0000,
Fons Adriaensen<f...@linuxaudio.org> wrote :
The thing is that I very much prefer listening to
stereo using two virtual speakers panned into 3rd order AMB rather
than sending L,R directly to two of the speakers.
It's very interesting!
How large is the resulting stereo image?
Is your technique documented somewhere?
Can it work with a horizontal hexagon?
With 2rd order AMB?
--
Marc
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
--
These are my own views and may or may not be shared by my employer
/*********************************************************************/
/* Dave Malham http://music.york.ac.uk/staff/research/dave-malham/ */
/* Music Research Centre */
/* Department of Music "http://music.york.ac.uk/"; */
/* The University of York Phone 01904 432448 */
/* Heslington Fax 01904 432450 */
/* York YO10 5DD */
/* UK 'Ambisonics - Component Imaging for Audio' */
/* "http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/mustech/3d_audio/"; */
/*********************************************************************/
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
