You can publish a final draft of your article on your personal web site. Consult these links for more information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self_archive http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/search.php?issn=0002-9890 http://www.ams.org/publications/authors/ctp http://www.ams.org/authors/ctp.pdf -- Marc
Robert Greene <gre...@math.ucla.edu> a écrit : > > Actually take my crack back--you can read it > for free. You just cannot download it for free > (exotic yes? Tree in forest etc) > http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2695796?uid=3739560&uid=2134&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21102208957307 > Have fun , if you like it! > Robert > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Robert Greene wrote: > > > > > Sorry--turns out that that link lets > > you read the whole thing(as opposed to the > > first page) only if you are a Jstor subscriber. > > (Eventually the academic world will > > figure out that all information ought > > to be public access--but not yet apparently)_ > > Anyone who finds the first page interesting > > can write to me directly and I shall email > > them a copy(or you can find the Math Monthly in > > university libraries). > > All the best > > Robert > > > > On Sat, 27 Apr 2013, Robert Greene wrote: > > > >> > >> Indeed(to SS's message) And real analytic systems > >> do not exist in the real world. Unless you believe > >> in complete pre-destination in the religious sense, > >> that God planned everything infinitely long ago > >> and arranged that things were then what they would > >> have to be so that their analytic continuation to the > >> present would be exactly as the world is now and on and on into > >> the future.... seriously, this is not happening. > >> > >> Real analytic functions are a favorite of mine > >> (I wrote a paper once for the American Math Monthly > >> to publicize the Morrey-Grauert Theorem, which is > >> absolutely one of my favorite results in mathematics. > >> You can read it here > >> > >> http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2695796?uid=3739560&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=21102208937197 > >> (free of charge) > >> if you care to. > >> > >> But in the real world, real analyticity is not happening! > >> In spite of its name, it is not real at all in the sense > >> of being a model of the real world under any circumstances > >> whatever! > >> > >> Only an approximation,and one assumes anything to the contrary > >> to one's peril. > >> > >> Robert > >> > >> PS This is particularly hazardous about musical matters... > >> no sane person thinks that knowing exactly what the > >> sound in the auditorium is for five minutes before > >> the Beethoven 9th tells you what the Beethoven 9th > >> performance will be--or even when it will start! > >> Real analyticity is wonderful stuff but it is absolutely > >> totally misleading about physical phenomena. > >> I suppose this is obvious but I thought I would > >> mention it anyway. (Incidentally this kind of > >> stuff is why the Morrey Grauert Theorem is so > >> hard to prove!) > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Sursound mailing list > >> Sursound@music.vt.edu > >> https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Sursound mailing list > > Sursound@music.vt.edu > > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound > _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
