I had a look, but I have a few problems..
I don't seem able to play 1a.
The test is not blind as the curious, like me, can see the file names in
the source.
The Longcat eg.1b is the clear winner.
I cannot force myself to listen to that much filtered noise - it seems
pointless and unpleasant!
I have converted one of your files from Soundcloud to binaural (2x2
convolution with my Dummy head IRs):
https://www.dropbox.com/s/k1iyum6zosl6o70/Paul%20Dirks%20-%20Johnny%27s%20Sky%20binaural.mp3
Regards,
David.
On 07/01/2014 14:08, Paul Dirks wrote:
Dear All
I see the most interesting things passing by in this mailing list.
This made me decided to do my thesis about binaural localization.
I have made two experiments to test three different binaural panners
and the accuracy of the localization.
1. New Audio Technology, Spatial Audio Designer
2. Longcat, H3D Binauralizer
3. Encoder: Daniel Courville, Solo2b2
Decoder: Harpex Ltd, Harpex-b
It would really help me if some of you would have 15min for this
experiment for the links below.
In the first one i ask the rate in the localization is good/bad in the
second one i aks the fill in
were the sound is percieved.
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1489998/Binaural-Localization-Experiment-1
(10 min)
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/1488686/Binaural-Localization-Experiment-2
(15 min)
All thanks for your time and you will see hear more from me in the
mailing list
Because we all same a nice and interesting subject.
With Kind Regards, Paul Dirks
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
