http://www.smyth-research.com/articles_files/SVSAES.pdf
As example for a "professional" system...
Best,
Stefan
Stefan Schreiber wrote:
dw wrote:
On 19/11/2014 22:12, Stefan Schreiber wrote:
Your posting seems to be meaningless if not arrogant, BTW.
Let me put it in a more positive way then.. Your thinking is
representative of the state of the art in binaural science.:-)
"Previous work <http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/publications/whitepaper250>
has shown that even with the state-of-the-art virtual surround
systems we don't currently get a big improvement in quality over a
conventional stereo down-mix. The perceived quality was found to vary
significantly according to the source material used."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/rd/blog/2014/10/tommies-in-3d
I actually have discussed this study with some people. (for example,
Günther Theile)
Experience with Realiser A8 from Smyth Research and IRT's BRS system
seems to indicate that binaural systems with head-tracking and
personalized HRTF filters < can't be distinguished from real (5.1)
speakers >.
(They used BRIRs of the listening room and the reference 5.1 speaker
system, of course.)
I don't believe that the BBC study is really flawless, BTW. (Günther
Theile thought the same.)
(I am too lazy to discuss this now, have some other stuff to do.)
Your thinking is representative of the state of the art in binaural
science.:-)
Maybe you should read more than (just) one "paper", before claiming
that nobody beside you has some clue? :-D
I also didn't claim to represent "binaural science", if I remember well.
Best,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit
account or options, view archives and so on.