Distribution to speakers using UDP multicast of a multichannel stream could possibly make the only time difference between channels be eventual receiver buffering.
Just speculation... Bo-Erik Den ons 29 maj 2019 22:32Paul Hodges <pwh-surro...@cassland.org> skrev: > --On 29 May 2019 19:53 +0000 "mgraves mstvp.com" <mgra...@mstvp.com> > wrote: > > > But for a signal sent by such a link, latency hardly matters if the > > signal is to be mixed later with other microphones (perhaps the > > ambisonic mic) that are fed directly, as the tracks can easily be > > aligned in the DAW! > > This discussion started with loudspeakers, though. My concern with > wi-fi latency when multiple links are required to multiple speakers > would be that the latency will not be consistent between channels. > Although buffering will keep the data flow going, there is no way to > ensure that the buffering in each data stream is near-enough the same > as required for phase accuracy. > > Paul > > -- > Paul Hodges > > _______________________________________________ > Sursound mailing list > Sursound@music.vt.edu > https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, > edit account or options, view archives and so on. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/private/sursound/attachments/20190529/9cb58a90/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
