Le 2021-05-23 à 11 h 57, Stefan Schreiber a écrit :

> In this sense independent from the actual source format. (Which does not have to be .caf, as Fons already wrote.)

Fons also wrote about the several advantages of CAF.

> - In my estimation you need standardization rather for the distribution/CE/application side than for production.

I'm less concerned by distribution. Not loosing information is more important; standardization can help, but I would not bet too much on it. Being creative with good documentation can be as good as trying to fit everything in elusive standards. Using the good parts of standards is already difficult.

> - I don’t think that (currently) any other lossless codec would have a good chance to be adopted in browsers, so there is (“maybe”) a problem with real-world music streaming.

We'll see. The "real world" is controlled by commerce. We can accept, adapt, propose alternatives, or do what we want when we can.

Marc




_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to