Daniel Courville wrote:
> Maybe it's a question of terminology

Yes. It's a question of terminology.
When using impulse response files from Angelo's site, he has named the UHJ to
"B-Format" conversion files , as _decoding_ (dec).
_Encoding_ (enc) files are used for conversion from B-format to UHJ.

Sampo Syreeni wrote:
I'd argue there *is* no conversion from UHJ to B-format

I know.

The way I understood Mark Anderson's question, that he is looking for a _practical_
way to decode his existing UHJ recordings into surround loudspeaker playback
with a software solution, ie. a software replacement for using UHJ decoding in a
tuner amplifier, such as the Onkyo SV909.

As far as I know, there are no software UHJ decoders into loudspeaker feeds available at all. This is easy to understand, because the demand for such software would be very little. (Both Onkyo 909 and the Meridian 565 use digital processing and do decode
UHJ, but they are not what we are talking about.)

I have converted some amount of UHJ recordings into loudspeaker feed signals in the way that has been already discussed. I just haven't done it in Reaper, I have been using AudioMulch, because it's simply a program that I am used to. This is what I do: Conversion from UHJ to W'X'Y' "B-format", then conversion from that into loudspeaker signals with a UHJ decoder VST plugin. The subjective listening experience of this is good enough for me, it cannot be worse than using an analog UHJ decoder such as a Minim or Troy. At least the software process doesn't add noise to the signal. It doesn't matter if the decoding isn't theoretically right, using an analog UHJ decoder doesn't provide any better accuracy either anyway. As Sampo says, when the signal has been
UHJ encoded, there is no way to retrieve the original B-Format.

I have quite a lot of Ambisonic UHJ CD:s and I'd rather listen to them as decoded into a
surround setup than listening to them in stereo with two speakers.

And by the way, the majority of UHJ encoded music releases _was_ recorded with a
Soundfield type microphone, because the largest number of them were made by
Nimbus Records. Nimbus didn't use the Soundfield-made microphone, they used their own setup made of two fig of eights and an omni. They did that mainly because the Soundfield was too noisy and they didn't need the Z signal, as it couldn't be encoded
into UHJ and carved onto vinyl anyway.

So, all Reaper users out there, please tell Mark how to do the routing in Reaper. David
already was in the business.

Eero
_______________________________________________
Sursound mailing list
Sursound@music.vt.edu
https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit 
account or options, view archives and so on.

Reply via email to