On 2022-04-06, Jack Reynolds wrote:
I am here if there’s anything you want to know.
Pricing, for starters, of course. :)
My marketing approach so far has been word of mouth really.
Appears to be working if you reach the list, and even someone like me.
I have been developing the designs with much field testing help from Axel and intended the mics to be as quiet and clean sounding as possible and also to be very difficult to break while camped out in the jungle. Waterproof Lemo connectors and 3D printed nylon makes for a much more robust product than the soundfields.
Have you been able to maintain the constant directional patterns, the high spatial aliasing limit, and the low noise floor of, say at best, SoundField V? What would you say the tradeoffs are for ruggedness, if any?
They are based on the classic tetrahedron of cardioids and there’s not much more going on that.
No sense in reinventing the wheel. But say again, which capsules do you use, and how do you support them, e.g. to insulate them from rattle and undue offsets? I mean, SoundFields are notorious for being fickle beasts. Bang them once against a corner of a table, and they need to be sent back to factory for a recalibration. You already said you take precautions, but how robust are they recording-wise? Have you measured?
-- Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de...@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front +358-40-3751464, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2 _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound - unsubscribe here, edit account or options, view archives and so on.
