At 04:58 PM 1/5/99 -0500, you wrote:
>
>I'm new to Linux and have been reading/lurking for some time but
>now am ready to do it [the first install].
>
>I've had my S.u.S.E. Linux 5.3 for about six months now. The date
>on the ends of the case of CD disks is July 1998.
>
>Is this this buggy edition from the early release, that was the talk of
>the day a few months back? Is it OK to go with or should I try and
>get a later release?
>
>Help with this potentially aggravating problem is welcomed now.
>Don't need extra difficulty if it can be avoided now. Thanks..
There are updates on the SuSE ftp site. SuSE tends to be less buggy out of
the box than RH, in my experience.
Here's an experiment, especially for the guy or gal asking about the diff
between Red Hat and SuSE: go to both sites and look at the list of Errata
for each distribution. It's enlightening! After installing RH 5.1 and
then looking at that, my next distribution was SuSE.
lunaslide * PGP key->pgpkeys.mit.edu port 11371
* * * * * *
Lisp has all the visual appeal of oatmeal with fingernail
clippings mixed in. (Other than that, it's quite a nice language.)
* * * -Larry Wall * *
* * * * *
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archiv at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
