On Tuesday, 5 December 2006 06:43, David Brownell wrote: > [ off $SUBJECT ] > > On Monday 04 December 2006 11:44 am, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > But I think I'll need to add TIF_FROZEN for all architectures, because > > > suspend > > > to RAM is supposed to work on all of them, isn't it? > > > > Well, yes, it should be added, but no, I do not think s2ram works on > > that many machines. > > Userspace "s2ram" != PM_SUSPEND_MEM ("suspend-to-RAM") though. > > I'm not even sure there's a globally acceptable definition of > what PM_SUSPEND_MEM indicates, beyond the fact that one expects > it saves more power than PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY. > > Yes, the Documentation/power/states.txt regurgitates ACPI spec text. > But lots of non-ACPI systems don't have any reason to do things > like ACPI says. And in terms of latency, I've seen a lot of that > be due to the PM framework taking so long to walk the device tree, > with no substantial difference between "standby" and "str" costs.
Well, in this particular case the question is only which architectures will actually use the freezer. :-) Greetings, Rafael -- If you don't have the time to read, you don't have the time or the tools to write. - Stephen King ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel