Hi!
> > Actually, what do you think about this patch? It removes special
> > handling of TASK_TRACED, and should do the trick, too...
>
> Well, I don't think so, ....
> > @@ -1702,7 +1702,9 @@ finish_stop(int stop_count)
> > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> > }
> >
> > - schedule();
> > + do {
> > + schedule();
> > + } while (try_to_freeze());
> > /*
> > * Now we don't run again until continued.
> > */
>
> ... because if you want try_to_freeze() here to trigger, then the task in
> question should have PF_FREEZE set, but we don't set it anywhere.
?? We set it to all the processes, so stopped processes get it,
too...??
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
