Hi,
On Tuesday, 5 December 2006 15:13, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Actually, what do you think about this patch? It removes special
> > > handling of TASK_TRACED, and should do the trick, too...
> >
> > Well, I don't think so, ....
>
> > > @@ -1702,7 +1702,9 @@ finish_stop(int stop_count)
> > > read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - schedule();
> > > + do {
> > > + schedule();
> > > + } while (try_to_freeze());
> > > /*
> > > * Now we don't run again until continued.
> > > */
> >
> > ... because if you want try_to_freeze() here to trigger, then the task in
> > question should have PF_FREEZE set, but we don't set it anywhere.
>
> ?? We set it to all the processes, so stopped processes get it,
> too...??
No, we don't. We only set it for the processes for which freezeable() returns
1.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
If you don't have the time to read,
you don't have the time or the tools to write.
- Stephen King
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
