Hi,
Okay, I have replaced my [1/2] with the patch below ...
On Tuesday, 5 December 2006 11:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Currently, if a task is stopped (ie. it's in the TASK_STOPPED state), it is
> > considered by the freezer as unfreezeable. However, there may be a race
> > between the freezer and the delivery of the continuation signal to the task
> > resulting in the task running after we have finished freezing other tasks.
> > This, in turn, may lead to undesirable effects up to and including a
> > corruption of data.
> >
> > To prevent this from happening we first need to make the freezer consider
> > stopped tasks as freezeable. For this purpose we need to make freezeable()
> > stop returning 0 for these tasks. We must remember, however, that the
> > stopped tasks need not receive the continuation signal before
> > thaw_processes()
> > is called, so as soon as PF_FREEZE is set for them try_to_freeze_tasks()
> > should stop counting them as the ones to wait for. Additionally, if
> > there's a
> > traced task (ie. a task in the TASK_TRACED state) the parent of which has
> > PF_FREEZE set and is stopped, try_to_freeze_tasks() should not wait for it.
> > Moreover, if there are some stopped tasks that haven't received the
> > continuation
> > signal before thaw_processes() is called, we must clear PF_FREEZE for them
> > so
> > that they don't go to the refrigerator when it's no longer desirable.
>
> Actually, what do you think about this patch? It removes special
> handling of TASK_TRACED, and should do the trick, too...
> Pavel
>
> diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
> index 7bcc976..d56e494 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/process.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/process.c
> @@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ static inline int freezeable(struct task
> (p->flags & PF_NOFREEZE) ||
> (p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) ||
> (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD) ||
> - ((p->exit_state == TASK_TRACED) && frozen(p->parent)) ||
> - (p->state == TASK_STOPPED))
> + ((p->exit_state == TASK_TRACED) && frozen(p->parent)))
... with the exception that I haven't added the last line, since there's some
code in try_to_freeze_tasks() that does the same and better ...
> return 0;
> return 1;
> }
> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> index 9a61944..e305ad1 100644
> --- a/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -1702,7 +1702,9 @@ finish_stop(int stop_count)
> read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> }
>
> - schedule();
> + do {
> + schedule();
> + } while (try_to_freeze());
> /*
> * Now we don't run again until continued.
> */
>
>
... and it fails to freeze processes if there's a stopped task (to verify,
run vi, press ^Z, and try to suspend).
It happens because we shouldn't count the stopped task as freezeable any
more after we've set PF_FREEZE for it and we can fix that by adding
if (p->state == TASK_STOPPED && freezing(p))
continue;
to the main loop in try_to_freeze_tasks(). Then we obtain the appended patch.
<tests again>
Now the stopped task doesn't prevent us from freezing processes. So far so
good. [To be continued.]
Greetings,
Rafael
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/kernel/power/process.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2.orig/kernel/power/process.c 2006-12-05
21:10:00.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/kernel/power/process.c 2006-12-05 21:56:57.000000000
+0100
@@ -28,8 +28,7 @@ static inline int freezeable(struct task
if ((p == current) ||
(p->flags & PF_NOFREEZE) ||
(p->exit_state == EXIT_ZOMBIE) ||
- (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD) ||
- (p->state == TASK_STOPPED))
+ (p->exit_state == EXIT_DEAD))
return 0;
return 1;
}
@@ -103,6 +102,9 @@ static unsigned int try_to_freeze_tasks(
if (frozen(p))
continue;
+ if (p->state == TASK_STOPPED && freezing(p))
+ continue;
+
if (p->state == TASK_TRACED &&
(frozen(p->parent) ||
p->parent->state == TASK_STOPPED)) {
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/kernel/signal.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2.orig/kernel/signal.c 2006-12-05 21:10:00.000000000
+0100
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc6-mm2/kernel/signal.c 2006-12-05 21:11:31.000000000
+0100
@@ -1829,7 +1829,9 @@ finish_stop(int stop_count)
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
- schedule();
+ do {
+ schedule();
+ } while (try_to_freeze());
/*
* Now we don't run again until continued.
*/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Suspend-devel mailing list
Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
