On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:52:15PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 7/27/07, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:25:10AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > Well, so user explicitely configured his machine to run on 80% max, > > > for some reason. Now you want suspend to explicitely override his > > > setting. That strikes me as a bad idea. Plus it does not belong to > > > suspend. > > > > 100% ACK > > Life is so easy when you do have no doubt... > Strong... 100%...
And still i support Pavel's opinion that this does not belong into s2disk. :-) Do not take this personally - we probably have different ideas about the separation of the taks. I worked on a few different suspend frameworks over the last years, and i think i have pretty good reasons on why i am wanting it that way. There might not always be a short and obvious explanation, but believe me: i have been there and i have done that. :-) -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers: SUSE Linux Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Suspend-devel mailing list Suspend-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/suspend-devel
