Did I read correctly somewhere in one of these conversations: it will be 2007 before we have low-sulfur diesel fuel? Or is that a state-to-state issue? If so, that is *way* too long and is the Oil-lobby-at-its-best-in-delaying-things. Seen it with the EV situation, seen it with the California ethanol situation. When you think you've beaten them, that usually means you've lost. They are that good.
>The current US situation is crazy and the lack of utilization of diesel >completely non-understandable. > >The only reason I can think about, that might be against energy saving and >diesel, is the possible negative effect on the all mighty GNP. In this >cases the net effect could be positive anyway and we have to find a more >reliable measurement on economic success than GNP. > >Hakan ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Home Selling? Try Us! http://us.click.yahoo.com/QrPZMC/iTmEAA/MVfIAA/FGYolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Biofuels list archives: http://archive.nnytech.net/ Please do NOT send Unsubscribe messages to the list address. To unsubscribe, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
