Hi Mike >Uh, Keith, hate to step in here but it works by "binary fusion" not >"fission."
Oh. That sounds rude to me, are you sure that isn't rude? This is a family list you know. >You're going to give >people the wrong idea. But isn't that the plan? >Also, where's my link? :-) I'll forward your request to the gentleman concerned. I refuse to be dragged into this row over which is the *real* Brand X, you can fight it out between you, this list just isn't big enough for two Brand X's. All best Keith >It works by "'binary fission' with additional vigour, by maximising > > combustion efficiency". Sounds great, think I'll buy some. Dammit, > > where's my wallet? > > > >Darryl McMahon wrote: > > >Oh, come on Keith! Everyone knows you can't get that kind of performance > >improvement without magnets and hydrogen injection using on-board >splitting of > >water based on zero-point energy. > > >I like the "binary fission" angle though. > >Imagine the kinds of performance improvements we'll get when I >finish my research > >on "trinary fission" (based on tritium, don't you know). > > > >Isn't fission elemental science, rather than molecular science? > > > >Facetiously yours, > > > >Darryl McMahon > > > >Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>Hello all > >> > >> > >> > >>>Jerry Eyers wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Not to knock everyone who has responded so far, but such items do exist, > >>>>although I don't believe 300 has been achieved, but there are documented > >>>>cases of big block 350's getting over 200mpg. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Documented by whom? (By the way, a 350 is a small block.) Under > >>>what test conditions? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>The process involves replacing the standard carb with a vapor > >>>> > >>>> > >>>only carb (like a > >>> > >>> > >>>>propane one) then pre-heating your fuel to a vapor, and feeding the > >>>>vapor. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> I have a lot of experience running gaseous fuels in engines, and > >>>NEVER have I seen any evidence that a fully vaporized fuel (such as > >>>propane or methane) can attain higher efficiencies than a fuel > >>>injected liquid fueled engine. (Though it is true that certain gases, > >>>hydrogen for example, can run leaner than gasoline. However, the > >>>difference in economy is incremental.) The calorific value of gaseous > >>>fuels is generally LESS than that of liquid fuels because they are not > >>>as dense, yet the fuel economy remains proportional to the overall > >>>energy available for combustion. > >>> > >>> To put it simply, vaporizing gasoline will not magically enhance fuel > >>>economy. Among some people, there remains a persistent myth that > >>>liquid fueled internal combustion engines are incapable of fully > >>>burning a fuel load. People who believe this insist that the vast > >>>majority of the air / fuel mixture leaving a combustion chamber is > >>>unburned, yet this is simply NOT true! > >>> > >>> > >>But it's such a good line Robert. What d'you think of this? I've just > >>been instructed by the would-be purveyors to add their link to the > >>biodiesel section of my website so they can promote it (it's not > >>called Brand X): > >> > >>"Brand X, the new KING of Global green energy by molecular science > >>and has the potential to add 30% more to the Global known fossil fuel > >>reserves. Brand X works on the concept of deionization of > >>electrically charged particle formed by gaining or losing electrons > >>in a solution. Brand X gives more kilometres to every litre, for all > >>diesel and gasoline internal combustion engines, respectively. Brand > >>X reduces GHG emission, substantially by enhancing a total combustion > >>technology with higher efficiency. As fossil fuel is exhaustible and > >>Brand X can help to consume less fuel, until economical alternative > >>energy is found. It eliminates smog-forming pollutants in all diesel > >>internal combustion engine exhaust. Brand X is compatible with all > >>kinds of internal combustion engines fuel by gasoline, diesel or > >>biofuel, including fuel from biomass. Green Brand X availability is > >>inexhaustible on Earth and eco-friendly." > >> > >>It works by "'binary fission' with additional vigour, by maximising > >>combustion efficiency". Sounds great, think I'll buy some. Dammit, > >>where's my wallet? > >> > >>Best wishes > >> > >>Keith > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>>>That said, I don't know of ANY that have worked with diesel engines, > >>>>only straight gas. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> A diesel engine will outperform a gasoline engine by virtue of higher > >>>compression pressure and the lack of a throttle, which considerably > >>>reduces pumping losses. In addition, diesel fuel contains more energy > >>>than gasoline. > >>> > >>>robert luis rabello > >>>"The Edge of Justice" > >>>Adventure for Your Mind > >>>http://www.newadventure.ca > >>> > >>>Ranger Supercharger Project Page > >>>http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/ _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
