>What if we had a voting sytem like American Idol, where people can >text message their votes every night.... Sort of scary. But is it >scarier to think of a democracy where the average person could vote on >each issue,
Lots of arguments about that in the past. Typical American answer: "There is no way I will ever support Mob Rule, over Rule of Law. Short and Simple answer." Others disagreed, including other Americans IIRC. Everybody likes short and simple answers, trouble is things aren't any more simple than they are, which often isn't. Why not start a KISS Party? I bet you'd get rich anyway, LOL! Here's one thread (whole thread linked at the end of the page): http://snipurl.com/j5lt [biofuel] Direct Democracy Best Keith >or one where as many people follow TV shows as care about >their actual government.... > >On 10/27/05, Joe Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well time for a new thread I guess cause we are a long way off topic. I > > think you are right Zeke it's hard not to draw certain >conclusions about the > > people who put these monsters in office. The problem is it's like going > > shopping. You think you have choice but then you find out your money goes > > to the same people at the top regardless of the choices you thought you > > made. The real problem is that the american lifestyle is not negotiable. > > How many here would willingly give up a bunch of affluence and convenience > > so that things might be a little more even in the world? Most of them are > > too busy trying to catch the carrot on a stick. Even when the government > > gives aid don't the farmers and shipping companies expect to be paid > > handsomley in the deal? So what really is the will of it's people that the > > government should reflect? Or is it really already doing that but in a way > > that upsets people but is really the only way left to maintain it? The oil > > is necessary to maintain the american lifestyle. Control of world economy > > is ideal to this plan even if it means doing dirty things that >aren't right. > > People are told they have democracy and they believe it but as you said > > voting once every four years is hardly democratic. Representative > > governance works for the rich and hopefully they can take >everyone along for > > the ride (because they need them). Boy they must have some real belly > > laughs in private when they think about the common man and the illusion of > > freedom and democracy. I wonder what things would look like if we >had a real > > democratic system. If every important decision was put to a vote, sure it > > would slow things down but hell a lot of people I talk to seem to think > > things are 'progressing' -and I hate to use that term, too quickly anyways. > > Surely electronic voting could make a system of national (and god forbid > > should I be so bold as to suggest....international) referendum possible. I > > know that only a tiny fraction of the world is on the web in terms of it's > > population but that does not mean that people could not have acces to a > > voting terminal. That must be a very scary thought. > > > > Joe > > > > Zeke Yewdall wrote: > > > > Sometimes I wonder if the rest of the world understands that all > > americans don't support GW and his policies though... After all, we > > claim to be a democracy, so therefore, shouldn't the government by > > nature reflect the will of it's people. > > > > In reality, only my congressional representative actualy represents > > me, but neither of my senators does, nor my president or vice > > president. I actually voted, but I effectively have almost no vote in > > our government. Our system is set up for rule by a very narrow > > majority with no effective minority voice. But if you listen to our > > rhetoric abroad, it's easy to forget this. > > > > Zeke > > > > On 10/26/05, Michael Redler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > "It seems you are intent on grouping all Americans as one." > > > > > > > > Yes, It looks that way, doesn't it? So, I will explain. > > > > > > > > Usually, I try not to generalize because it leaves out a lot of information > > and can be manipulated to align itself with a particular agenda. >However, on > > those occasions when I say "Americans" (my apologies to Canadians >and others > > living on this hemisphere) or US citizens in general, I'm pointing toward a > > trend. The references I give below, are what I use to at least partly back > > up my position on those trends. Now, although the argument I give >is my own, > > I find others who agree (some of them are my neighbors). > > > > > > > > "...I went to war for this country and would do it over, for the right > > reasons..." > > > > > > > > The fact that there are soldiers who are duty bound and fighting honorably > > in a war is not the reason for the arrival of one to three hundred thousand > > protesters in Washington DC on September 24th. It is the horribly >convoluted > > reason for war which is so disturbing. > > > > > > > > "All I can do is try in my own way to change things for the better." > > > > > > > > The US as a whole is showing symptoms of fascism. If I, as you say, "group > > all Americans as one", please prove me wrong and resist the simple > > perception of our culture which hides our dark little secrets and makes > > hypocrites out of our government each time they go to preach democracy to > > another sovereign nation. Our government needs to "play nice with others" > > and work toward being a participant in a World community instead of further > > construction of it's empire. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > Derick Giorchino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You get not too much of an argument from me but. It seems you are intent on > > grouping all Americans as one. > > > > I also have more than one citizenship. But I went to war for this country > > and would do it over, for the right reasons, when I came to America many > > years ago it was the envy of the world. And I feel it still would >be. If not > > for the government and corporate B.S. It disgusts me, but I don't include > > myself as part of that. All I can do is try in my own way to change things > > for the better. If not for me but maybe my kids and grand kids. Not that I > > think it will ever be as it was. But surly it could stand just a tad of > > improvement. > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Michael Redler > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 7:35 AM > > To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org > > Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Scientific method- Easy Keith! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, you have my attention. > > > > > > > > > > > > Derick wrote: "Not all Americans are lazy stupid or helpless." > > > > > > > > > > > > As an American, I'd like to think that this is true. In fact, I don't think > > that Americans are more lazy than any other country or culture. Despite > > being the most obese country in the world, we find ourselves in the > > workplace at least as many hours as any other country in the world. > > > > > > > > > > > > Joe wrote: "This explains the typical american arrogance that >drips from his > > rhetoric and which irritates you so well." > > > > > > > > > > > > There are expectations by Americans that other countries and cultures > > recognize us as somehow superior. If anyone doubts this, here is a little > > experiment: Take comments so commonly heard in political speeches >as well as > > at backyard barbecues (i.e. "We are the greatest country in the world") and > > apply it to Germany (for example). In fact, when an American president > > (especially our current president) makes a speech and it's translated into > > German and "The United States" is replaced with "Germany", I would argue > > that many Americans would be shocked that ANY head of state would make such > > a speech. This is the American double standard which I like to call a kind > > of pseudo-mutuality since there are still a few countries who are > > politically and culturally aligned with this image. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is something terribly wrong with our culture and it's just >outside the > > view of most citizens. Calling Americans "lazy" though, is inaccurate and > > minimizes our long list of troubles. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is what I mean by "list". You try to connect the dots. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.) "We" have more homicides in our major cities than casualties in war > > (irrespective of the circumstances in that war). > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.) "We" have a bizarre view of leadership and fairness by virtue of the > > fact that the president (irrespective of which president) is pledged > > allegiance even when he (not "she" -yet) takes action which adversely > > effects the majority of citizens. At the same time, Americans are known for > > supporting the "underdog" and down trodden - almost as if to perpetuate and > > preserve this demographic. > > > > > > > > > > > > 3.) "We" struggle to have a standard of K-12 education that matches that of > > other developed countries while placing huge emphasis on "faith" and mixed > > interpretations of morality. > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.) Half of the citizens in the United States do not support a document > > which prevented dictatorships and provided the means for citizens >to prosper > > for the last two and a half centuries. At the same time, the same >proportion > > of citizens don't show up to vote for (arguably) the most >powerful political > > position in the free world. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.radessays.com/viewpaper.php?nats=MTAxMToyOjE&request=38800 > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a397df8d00620.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > 5.) Despite being a republic, the US government has taken it upon itself to > > preach democracy to other countries - countries with better representation > > of their citizens through coalition governments, better voter turnout and > > more opportunities for referendums. > > > > > > > > > > > > 6.) We have a so called "free press" which either hides or glorifies the > > last five points according to a political agenda, making Americans believe > > that journalism here is as comprehensive as that in other developed > > countries. > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and the list goes on. > > > > > > > > > > > > One last note: I have a dual citizenship which allows me to >permanently move > > out of the country. However, my "other list" of things that I love about my > > country (having nothing to do with government or politics) keeps me here. I > > prefer to stay and be one of many voices of dissent. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > Other References: > > > > > > http://www.atheists.org/flash.line/atheism9.htm > > > > > > http://gozips.uakron.edu/~david27/flm/chap9.htm > > > > > > http://www.accd.edu/pac/humaniti/colby/L19.htm _______________________________________________ Biofuel mailing list Biofuel@sustainablelists.org http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org Biofuel at Journey to Forever: http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages): http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
