----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 3:34
PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] WHAT REALLY
HAPPENED ON SEPT 11
Kirk McLoren wrote:
Unfortunately since you arent qualified to judge what you read you
accept information based on
authority.
What
nonsense!!!
Wrap your mind around something written
by an engineering firm:
"DID THE WORLD TRADE CENTER
TOWERS ACTUALLY IMPLODE?
No. They collapsed in an uncontrolled
fashion, causing extensive damage to surrounding structures, roadways and
utilities. Although when viewed from a distance the towers appeared to have
telescoped almost straight down, a closer look at video replays reveal
sizeable portions of each building breaking free during the collapse, with the
largest sections--some as tall as 30 or 40 stories--actually laying out in
several directions. The outward failure of these sections is believed to have
caused much of the significant damage to adjacent structures, and smaller
debris caused structural and cosmetic damage to hundreds of additional
buildings around the perimeter of the site.
WHY DID THEY
COLLAPSE?
Each 110-story tower contained a central steel core
surrounded by open office space, with 18-inch steel tubes running vertically
along the outside of the building. These structural elements provided the
support for the building, and most experts agree that the planes impacting the
buildings alone would not have caused them to collapse. The intense heat from
the burning jet fuel, however, gradually softened the steel core and
redistributed the weight to the outer tubes, which were slowly deformed by the
added weight and the heat of the fire. Eventually, the integrity of these
tubes was compromised to the point where they buckled under the weight of the
higher floors, causing a gravitational chain reaction that continued until all
of the floors were at ground level.
DID THE
TERRORISTS PLANT ANY BOMBS IN THE BUILDINGS IN ADVANCE TO GUARANTEE THEIR
DEMISE?
To our knowledge there is no evidence whatsoever to support
this assertion. Analysis of video and photographs of both towers clearly shows
that the initial structural failure occurred at or near the points where the
planes impacted the buildings. Furthermore, there is no visible or audible
indication that explosives or any other supplemental catalyst was used in the
attack.
HOW DOES
THIS EVENT COMPARE WITH A NORMAL BUILDING IMPLOSION?
The only
correlation is that in a very broad sense, explosive devices (airplanes loaded
with fuel) were used to intentionally bring down buildings. However it can be
argued that even this vague similarity relates more to military explosive
demolition than to building implosions, which specifically involve the
placement of charges at key points within a structure to precipitate the
failure of steel or concrete supports within their own footprint. The other
primary difference between these two types of operations is that implosions
are universally conducted with the utmost concern for adjacent properties and
human safety---elements that were horrifically absent from this event.
Therefore we can conclude that what happened in New York was not a building
implosion.
You won't likely be happy with
this, but that's because you're looking for a conspiracy that is far better
explained by ineptitude.
That is a close second to voting on the truth. It seems odd you see
organised control in the hydrocarbon industry yet the possibility of a Pearl
Harbor type episode in the 9-11 disaster is
incomprehensible.
No, it's not
incomprehensible at all. We were attacked by the Japanese at Pearl
Harbor. Airplanes filled the sky over Pearl Harbor and dropped torpedos
and bombs on our ships. Many of those ships were sunk in the
attack. There's a lot of evidence suggesting a degree of threat
awareness at the upper echelons of government, but it wasn't staged by covert
American intelligence operatives, the Mossad, or even a bunch of
anti-government loonies. There was no "conspiracy". There was a
cause / effect relationship between Japanese torpedos, bombs and sunken
ships.
Likewise, we all witnessed airplanes being flown into
buildings on September 11, 2001. Not long afterward, the buildings came
down. The buildings did NOT come down until after the airplanes had
flown into them. What's so hard for you to understand about
this?
Now, the question of who financed the
operation and is ultimately responsible for the attack is one that has not
been answered to my satisfaction. A lot of the facts don't add up, but
in my mind, that's more of an indication of governmental blundering and
butt-covering than a conspiracy. Did the current administration white
wash facts and cover things up? Absolutely! Does that change the
fact that two fully fueled 767s crashed into the WTC towers, set them on fire
and ultimately resulted in their collapse? Absolutely
not!
So, if I'm going to swallow the big conspiracy
idea, which one should I believe? I've read several of them,
including:
*There were no actual 767s flown into
buildings that day. These were remotely piloted military aircraft packed
with explosives.
*The airframes that crashed into
the WTC towers were later seen on the tarmacs of other
airports.
*Mossad agents were detained on that day,
having been caught gleefully laughing about the "demolition" they'd supposedly
pulled off.
*The "demolition" was carried out
covertly, by agents of the American government.
*Cruise missiles with fake wings and tail sections destroyed the WTC
towers.
Now, which one of these do YOU
approve?
The photographs of the rubble pile establish where it fell - obviously.
Most of the so called technical explanations are of the type - "If you cant
dazzle them with brilliance baffle them with
bull$$H!+"
Not so. The WTC
towers didn't fall on their own footprints. Many of the surrounding
buildings were also damaged as they came down. You're grasping at
straws, Kirk!
Forget the stories - just look at the
pictures.
Forget the conjecture and
nonsense. Look at the evidence.
robert luis rabello
"The Edge of Justice"
Adventure for Your Mind
http://www.newadventure.ca
Ranger Supercharger Project Page
http://www.members.shaw.ca/rabello/
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing
list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
Biofuel
at Journey to
Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the
combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date:
9/19/2006