George Frantz wrote:
I'm not denying that there are issues, and I'm not denying that
we are dealing with an industry that would dig up its mothers'
bones if they thought there was natural gas under them.  But
let's work the problem.  And let's not destroy our credibility
with wild assertions that any knowledgeable person can easily
discredit.

Without knowing yet where we'll end up with this, I completely
agree with what George is saying here.

I think the sustainability community has to be very careful how it
proceeds with the hydrofracking issue.

On the one hand, it's clear that we're facing some pretty scary
aesthetic and water quality problems (and as a person who gets his
drinking water from a well downslope from a lot of leases over the
town line in Newfield, I have to admit to being personally mighty
worried about this).  Plus damage to the local roads and some
pretty sizable toxic waste disposal problems.

On the other hand, we have:

 - The economic inevitability of eventually getting that gas out;
   anyone who thinks this isn't going to happen is kidding
   themselves

 - Our eventual need to squeeze out of the ground every cubic inch
   of natural gas we can to fend off mass starvation while we try
   to wean food production away from nitrogen fertilizer (made
   almost entirely out of natural gas)

 - The moral indefensibility of getting up in arms about possible
   damage to our local environment when we happily run our
   appliances and civic infrastructure on electricity generated
   from coal

 - The social justice and local food supply implications of
   denying income from gas leases to local farmers who are
   desperately looking for ways to hang on to their land (and
   while it's probably the least of our problems, I'll note that
   the local sustainability movement stands to lose whatever
   credibility it might have with these folks if it takes an
   adversarial position that's not solidly supported by the facts)

So....  Let's tread carefully here.  What I'm taking away from
this thread is the danger of undercutting our position by using
data from places that aren't directly comparable with ours.

I'm beginning to suspect that the most constructive goal would be
to control hydrofracking in a way that makes it proceed as slowly
as possible and with as little damage to the environment as
possible.  Maybe we should be focusing on that.

Jon




_______________________________________________
For more information about sustainability in the Tompkins County area, please 
visit:  http://www.sustainabletompkins.org/

RSS, archives, subscription & listserv information for:
[email protected]
http://lists.mutualaid.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainabletompkins
Questions about the list? ask [email protected]
free hosting by http://www.mutualaid.org

Reply via email to