Agree. Such construction is also very useful. +1 to implement it.
From one side we know, that we should name variables with meaningful
names. From other side, the longer the name of variable - the more noise
you see in code and in some cases this noise,copy-paste,ide completion
suggestions produce bugs in code when you need a lot of assignments/actions
for one/two particular instance(s).
So IMO such "with" produces less errors and is clear.
Please provide your opinions on this.
On 15.04.2016 3:47, Dany St-Amant via swift-evolution wrote:
Thought with a free standing 'with' the next request to come in, could be to be
able to do something like:
with source, destination {
$1.something = $0.somethingSimilar
$1.x = $0.bound.left
$1.y = $0.point.top
}
So using $0, may be a future proofing option.
Dany
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
